Modern .NET is cross-platform, fast and open source, and C# is one of the most productive languages for the enterprise application that has to integrate with everything Microsoft already runs. We build on the current .NET — ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework Core, minimal APIs, Blazor where it fits — for teams whose estate is Azure, Active Directory and SQL Server.
Our .NET development services cover new applications, the modernisation of .NET Framework systems that still carry the business, and the integrations that connect them to the rest of the stack.
Let’s talk .NETDevelopment services
From a greenfield ASP.NET Core API to a .NET Framework 4 application brought onto the current runtime, our .NET development services cover the Microsoft side of the enterprise.
01
Web applications and APIs on the current .NET: minimal APIs or controllers, Entity Framework Core with migrations under review, identity via Entra ID, OpenAPI contracts, health checks and OpenTelemetry — clean architecture where the domain does not depend on the framework.
02
Web Forms, WCF and .NET Framework 4 applications moved to the current .NET in stages — the upgrade assistant where it helps, characterisation tests where it does not, a strangler approach for the parts that need a redesign — so the business keeps running on the old system until the new one is proven.
03
Services designed for Azure — App Service and Container Apps, Functions for event-driven work, Service Bus, Azure SQL and Cosmos DB, Key Vault for secrets, Managed Identity everywhere — with infrastructure as code and deployment pipelines your platform team can own.
04
Connecting .NET applications to Dynamics 365, SharePoint, SAP and the line-of-business systems that already hold the data — message-based where it should be, API-based where it must be, with the reconciliation and monitoring that make an integration trustworthy.
05
WPF and .NET MAUI applications and Blazor internal tools for operations, finance and plant floors — the applications that never trend but run the business every day, built with the same testing and release discipline as the customer-facing work.
Benefits breakdown
Why hire us for .NET and C#, in five lines you can hold us to.
When identity is Entra ID, the database is SQL Server and the cloud is Azure, .NET integrates with the least friction — and we know where the friction still is.
Current .NET is among the fastest mainstream web runtimes and runs on Linux containers; the ‘Windows-only, heavyweight’ picture is a decade out of date and we build accordingly.
Records, pattern matching, nullable reference types and LINQ make C# expressive without giving up static safety — fewer bugs reach review, and review is faster.
Long-term-support releases every two years with a published policy; we plan the upgrade in the roadmap so the application never sits on an unsupported runtime.
Visual Studio, first-class debugging, profilers and Azure DevOps or GitHub pipelines — the tooling your team already licenses and knows, used properly.
Tech expertise
.NET is one backend in this stack; here is what we ship around it. Every name with a page of its own is a link.
Explore the servicesComparative analysis
What changes when the team actually knows the stack, in six rows.
| Feature | DigiWagon | Other agencies |
|---|---|---|
| Backend architecture | Built like a boss — modular, mighty, made to last, and load-tested before launch. | Patchy blueprints that crumble under real-world traffic. |
| API mastery | REST, GraphQL, gRPC, webhooks — versioned, documented, idempotent. You name it, we ship it. | REST-only mindset with clunky API designs. |
| Estimation | Real timelines and budget, no plot twist — the estimate names its assumptions. | Estimate comes with ‘oops, missed that!’ |
| Security protocols | Dependency audits on every pull request, secrets out of the code, patches on a schedule. | Oh, did we forget that patch? |
| Post-launch care | We watch it like a hawk — monitoring, upgrades, incident response. Not even a blink. | Ghosting after launch — hope you have backup plans. |
| Documentation | Docs so clear even your interns can hand them off: OpenAPI, runbooks, decision records. | Documentation? Yeah, we will get back to you on that… |
Industries
Three of the nine industries we build for, with the .NET fit behind each, linked to the industry page.
01
Plant, quality and maintenance applications that talk to SCADA, ERP and the Microsoft estate already on the factory network — .NET where the operations team runs Windows and Azure.
.NET in Manufacturing02
Back-office and reporting systems on SQL Server and Azure with Entra ID sign-in, audit trails and the batch and reconciliation jobs finance runs every night.
.NET in FinTech03
Clinical and administrative applications integrating with hospital systems over HL7 and FHIR, deployed inside a Microsoft-centred IT estate with identity and access already governed.
.NET in HealthcareInsights
Writing from the engineering work: a guide to API-first development, software product development versus custom software, and when to rebuild, refactor or buy.
FAQ
Direct answers on .NET versions, Framework migration, Azure, cross-platform .NET and what our .NET development services include after launch.
New work goes on the current long-term-support .NET with ASP.NET Core and Entity Framework Core. We maintain and modernise .NET Framework 4.x applications — Web Forms, WCF, MVC 5 — and plan their move to the current runtime as part of the engagement, so nothing is left on an unsupported version.
Yes, in stages. We assess with the upgrade tooling, put characterisation tests around the seams, move shared libraries first, then the application — replacing WCF and Web Forms with current equivalents where needed. The business runs on the old system until each stage is proven, and every stage is reversible.
No. Current .NET runs on Linux and macOS, ships in containers, and deploys to any cloud. It is a natural fit for Azure and a Microsoft identity estate, which is where most of our .NET work lands, but we run it on AWS and on-premises Linux where that is what the client has.
Both, depending on the team. Blazor suits internal tools and teams who want C# end to end; React or Angular suits customer-facing products where the frontend team already lives in TypeScript. The API is designed the same way either way, so the choice is not permanent.
Through their supported APIs — Dataverse and Microsoft Graph for the Microsoft side, OData or IDoc-based connectors for SAP — with message-based integration where systems should be decoupled. Every integration gets reconciliation and monitoring, because an integration that fails silently is worse than one that fails loudly.
Scheduled runtime and dependency updates, security patching, monitoring with alerting your team can act on, incident response and a quarterly performance and cost review on Azure. Documentation and runbooks are handed over from day one; we can run the application for you, with you, or hand it over entirely.
Tell us what the application has to do and what it has to integrate with, and we will show you comparable enterprise work before anything is scoped.
Ask an AI about this page
One click opens the assistant you already use with a question that points it at this page, so the answer comes from what we publish, not a guess.
The question it opens withRead https://digiwagon.com/dotnet and explain when DigiWagon recommends .NET / C#, what it would ask about my product before scoping, and which of its case studies are relevant. Stick to what the page says and mark anything you are not sure about.
